HF's rating our our prospect with the 2010 draftees included

so according to hockeys future ranking of our prospects this is the list

http://www.hockeysfuture.com/articles/12284/mikael_granlund_premieres_as_minnesota_wilds_top_prospect/

1: Granlund
2: Scandella
3: Cuma
4: Gillies (really? over larson and zucker?)
5: Hacket
6: Almond
7: Larsson
8: Wellman
9: Broda the tryout we signed after WAS let him go
10: Haula

ok so umm a guy in Wellman who played in the NHL and played WELL in the NHL is below Gillies? that list is messed up, i agree with Granlund at 1, but after him its Wellman top 6 potential and not that far away from getting to that either. Larsson is way ahead of Gillies, he has a deadly shot and is young, plays a two way game. Hell i'd even put Zucker before Gillies, yes he's small but he's proven he can play, 17 year old played a role in USA beating Canada last year i think he'll end up being a pretty good pick in 3ish years.

what are your thoughts on the rankings based on being a bias fan?

Just because you don't like Gillies doesn't mean the guy is worthless. Zucker has proven nothing compared with Gillies. Gillies still fits in the top 6 IMO.

I'd have him ahead of both Larsson and Zucker easy... I do agree that Wellman needs to move WAY up that list! Almond at #6? SERIOUSLY!?!?!? Wellman, Larsson, Prosser all should easily be ahead of him.

BTW - why do you rate Zucker so high?

i don't hate Gillies i'd much like him to be good, to surprise all of us and make the team this year and contribute.

Zucker i think is going to show a lot he was 17 and won gold with the under 20 squad and contributed, i doubt that we had so little talent trying out that we had to put a 17 year old on there. maybe rating him ahead of gillies at this point was too much, just saying tho Wellman is easily 2nr or 3rd best prospect we have.

Wellman is 4th on my list behind the same 3 that HF listed.